InfluxDB VS Elasticsearch

Choosing which storage solution to use for time series data is not a straightforward task to say the least. Today, one is almost spoilt for choice as there are some great alternatives out there, but this article attempts to shed some light on two of these solutions — Elasticsearch and InfluxDB.  

Why this comparison? While InfluxDB was designed for time series data, Elasticsearch was designed, and is mostly used, for document indexing. However, despite this design and functional disparity, Elasticsearch is used by many for time series data and we wanted to check how well these two databases perform.  

Hopefully, this high-level comparison will help those searching for an answer to the dilemma stated above. 

What Is Time Series Data? 

Time series data can be defined as data points indexed by their temporal order, where the distance between two data points may or may not be equal. If the frequency at which data points are taken is constant (e.g., sampling the data every 10 ms) then the series is called a discrete time data series. 

In computer systems, all user data can potentially be represented as time series data, as all stored information has a time component that can provide different metrics in different scenarios. For example, Twitter, Facebook, and LinkedIn have data on the user’s registration date, as well as the dates and times at which various actions were performed (tweet or article posted, activity liked, etc.).  

Having data arrive at a higher frequency can create challenges, including having to handle a greater number of write requests per second and needing to store all the data. One sensor, with a sampling frequency of 30 requests per second and a payload of 1KB, can generate 86MB of information each day, meaning 100 sensors would create a data load of 8GB per day. Querying and aggregating such a large amount of data to extract useful information is another issue to be considered.  

And so, deciding on the right storage engine to use for time series data is one of the first challenges to overcome when designing a temporal data-generating system. 

In principle, you can use almost any database engine to store your time series data, but issues can arise later, when you want to perform analysis on the information collected. We are going to discuss two popular databases that are used to store and analyze time series data, mostly in combination with other tools. 


InfluxDB is a database whose general purpose is to store time series data. The storage and querying of data are optimized for data points with a time component. 

When it comes to storing data, the InfluxDB team has developed a storage engine that follows the LSM tree paradigm. The engine organizes its data in shards for each block time interval depending on the retention policy. If the retention policy is unlimited, then shards will be stored for seven days. Each shard is related to the database for which it is created. Besides the data shards, the storage engine consists of multiple other components like the in-memory index, WAL, cache for data stored in WAL, TSM files where the data is compressed and stored, FileStore, and more. 

Time series can be organized in databases where you can logically organize the kinds of data you are planning to store. Measurements such as disk_spacecpu_load  and others can, in a way, be treated as tables are in SQL, where the primary key is always the time component. These “tables” have to contain at least one key component that describes which data is stored (e.g., core_1, server_12) and its numeric value. When queried, the measurement table will return the timestamp, together with the keys and value for the stored data.  

Writing data to InfluxDB can be done in many ways. You can use the command line interface provided, the client libraries for your language, or the REST API made available for both reading and writing data to the database. This API also allows you to create or drop databases and tables.  

Here is an InfluxDB example returning values from the cpu_load_short table: 

To facilitate the easy extraction of data from the database, InfluxDB provides a SQL-ish interface, so called because it does not make all SQL commands available. Data aggregation can also be performed on the database level without any need for external processing. Support for aggregation queries is built into InfluxDB and can be accessed through the SQL and REST interfaces. Some of the functions available for aggregation are COUNT(), DISTINCT(), INTEGRAL(), MEAN(), MEDIAN(), MODE(), SPREAD(), STDDEV(), and SUM(). 

Here is an example for an InfluxDB aggregation query: 

Also, InfluxDB has support for data transformation, selector, and even prediction queries. By calling functions, you can easily transform data before returning it to the client that is going to consume it (see for more info). 

Check out this example of a data transformation query returning a derivative of water levels between each data point over a specified date interval: 

InfluxDB also provides a simple UI where you can run queries on the database, view data in tabular form, and also execute some DDL operations. To visualize your data, you can use other tools like Grafana, where you can configure access to your InfluxDB data and visualize it. 

Installing InfluxDB is relatively simple. Depending on the operating system, you can either use a package manager or download the binaries and install it manually. It’s worth pointing out that even though InfluxDB is an open-source database, released under an MIT license, it has some features that are not open-sourced, such as those related to clustering, that are available in the InfluxEnterprise product offered by the maintainer, InfluxData. 


Elasticsearch is a full-text search and analysis engine based on Apache Lucene. Since its initial release in 2010, Elasticsearch has gained popularity as a fast and scalable document indexing and search engine with millions of users worldwide. 

Elasticsearch stores data in indices, similar to relational databases, where data is logically separated. A single index can contain data for users (personal information, hobbies, etc.), companies (e.g., name, addresses, phone numbers), or other entities. The ability to split indices into one or many shards is a crucial feature that allows Elasticsearch to greatly outperform InfluxDB in the horizontal scaling, distribution, and parallelization of data. Elasticsearch is designed as a distributed system in which it is easy to add more instances to the cluster—it will move shards and replicate to new instances automatically in order to maximize the cluster’s availability. 

Internally, Elasticsearch relies on Lucene’s implementation of inverted indices, which can be viewed as a map of terms and the documents in which these terms can be found. This is useful in that it can return a subset of documents containing terms specified in a search query. 

Another data structure that significantly boosts performance, especially during aggregation queries, is the doc values structure. While inverted indices map terms to documents, doc values maps the other way around, mapping documents to terms. Basically, a map consists of a list of documents and the terms that are contained in each document. 

Similar to InfluxDB, Elasticsearch provides an HTTP REST API and Java API for communication and data manipulation. There are also language-specific libraries available, which are usually wrappers around the aforementioned APIs. 

The storage of time series data begins with defining mappings. In Elasticsearch, this means telling the engine how it should store the data, and also the fields that we are going to send for indexing. Defining this in advance improves the subsequent performance when querying the data. 

The timestamp added to your mappings should be one of the properties that you index. In previous versions, a _timestamp field was added to every record inserted by default, but this practice was deprecated in newer versions of Elasticsearch. 

Elasticsearch provides an aggregation framework that can be really useful during analysis, as it gives developers the option to perform aggregation over an entire set of documents, or time series data in our case. In contrast to InfluxDB, where you can only perform aggregation over numerical data, Elasticsearch can also handle textual data, which becomes very helpful when you have logs that contain messages, exceptions, and other text-based information. 

In comparison with InfluxDB, Elasticsearch needs a little more configuration to run on large datasets. You need to define your mappings, which fields are indexed, what kind of data they contain (full text, numerical, etc), number of primary shards, and so on. Some of these settings—and others besides—cannot be changed once documents are added to the index, so they need to be considered carefully before you start using it. The only way to remedy problems later is to actually create a new index with new settings, reindex all the documents, and then switch to the new index. Carrying this out on a live system is, of course, something you want to avoid. 

Elasticsearch is usually used in combination with the stack’s other components — Logstash and Kibana (together called the ELK Stack or Elastic Stack) for log aggregation, analysis and monitoring. Logstash is an open-source processing pipeline that gives you the ability to import logs from different sources (files, message queues, databases, etc.), transform them, and output them to a defined endpoint or data store, usually Elasticsearch. Kibana is the stack’s UI, providing users with a visual representation of the stored log files, and allowing them to easily configure customized dashboards, tables, and other aids to visualization. 

Summing it up 

Storing a large amount of time series data can be a tough task, one that requires considerable effort and research on which storage engine to use. Both InfluxDB and Elasticsearch have their pros and cons, and there are no hard and fast rules on which is the right one for a particular use case. 

Even though InfluxDB is a relatively young database, it seems that it is more specialized in time series data. Benchmarking has shown that it can handle a higher number of writes than Elasticsearch, and further development should allow it to easily become the leader in time series data storage.

Also, if you plan on logging textual data in your database—log messages, exceptions, requests, or responses, for example—and later querying them by content, Elasticsearch is a better solution since it specializes in textual data searching. Using InfluxDB for this kind of logging and later querying might require the use of an additional search engine, which can cause further problems in terms of synchronizing the data between the two systems. As a final consideration, it is worth pointing out that the aggregation framework in Elasticsearch is more extendable, and is not limited to just numerical and textual data. 

Visualize and Analyze your Data with